Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | HeyMeco's commentslogin

Ideally things are going to adapt the Mesa Teflon framework. See here: https://docs.mesa3d.org/teflon.html

Available for NXP IMX8M, Amlogic A311D and RK3588


First of all thank you everybody for reading and commenting! I want to address some of the comments I got regarding the article:

- xyz vendor is not covered: For this there is a simple answer, I don't have the hardware so I can't make a fair judgement when reporting about it. I don't want to be another reporter of basic benchmark scores & 1080P Youtube playback but actually show off the hardware capabilties with the right software. Hopefully this will be possible with more in the future as this project grows

- This is only one sector of the space why don't you have micro controllers or x86: While I want to cover all aspects of the space I am not an embedded engineer. I started during covid with the goal to replace my X86 homelab server with an ARM one to save power and got deeper into the rabbit hole until I ended up maintaining some boards and doing some Debian/Ubuntu based bring ups in my freetime. This led to me wanting to have one place to share my findings along the way and document things that might leave one stranded in the world of Yocto/U-Boot/Linux Kernel/Device-Trees/etc. and I created sbcwiki.com, not only for me to share my findings but for others to contribute with simple markdown files to the GitHub repo too.


In this format I go deep down the Mailing lists, news articles and more to summarise what exciting hardware has been published and software has been merged into Linux. Also breaking down rumours and developer conferences about future SoC‘s. Hope you all find it useful!

If you could mirror your feed on Bluesky, that would be appreciated. Some of us will not use X.

Mastodon or bust!


Awesome, thanks!

Can you include more prices? It would give me an idea of the cost even if it is in USD. What i found most annoying about my latest search is that it is hard to find something not named raspberry or Arduino for a reasonable price. I was looking for a simple gigabit board with usb 3 to attach a removable drive to. The only one i found was raspberry pi orange 3B . Nobody else seemed to have gigabit nic with usb 3.

The Raspberry PI also has an intangible value from years of community goodwill. And people trust that the kernel OS support will be around in 10 years.

The NVIDIA solution is impressive... but self-immolated with the consumer price point (markets for government equipment may work.) People usually either have money or time... asking for both in a product is foolish.

The other SoM also have a long-tail market attention problem, as one could spend 2 weeks tracking unstable kernel driver problems. Or just drop in a $35 pi, and solve the task at hand. =3


Does a Banana Pi BPi-M5 fit your specs? The banana pis have pretty good networking options.

Why would you expect USB3 and Ethernet, fast and relatively expensive interfaces, to be attached to a cheap low-spec MCU?

Did you consider a ready-made USB3 extender over Ethernet? There is a reason they cost so much ;-/


Rockchip SoCs starting with the RK3399 can do both USB3 and Ethernet.

The only board that I own that does both at the same time is the Pine64 Quartz64 that uses the RK3566. My Pinebook Pro doesn't have an ethernet port, Orange Pi 5 Max has ethernet but doesn't use the builtin controller to provide it.


I use NetBSD on a Pine64 RockPro64 and use USB3. It has been stable:

    awge0: flags=0x8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
            ec_capabilities=0x1<VLAN_MTU>
            ec_enabled=0x1<VLAN_MTU>
            address: 26:80:xx:xx:xx:xx
            media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT full-duplex)

i see Quartz64 with 4GiB of RAM offered for $60. Sounds pretty reasonable for an SBC of this caliber. I mostly mean that something like the original RPi would be underpowered for USB3.0 and 1GbE, to say nothing of smaller devices like a $15 ESP32.

Pi4 does two USB 3.0 ports, but you are right in that USB 3.1 is a little much for a SoM.

Its a nice little SoM, in some ways it was better than the pi5 for hardware media encoding. =3


Love when actually useful sites appear. Fits the same category of sites like the one LTTLabs is working on


Think of the photos app on your phone and it’s "intelligent" search bar


Rkvdec H264 and H265 are sent in and work in test environments https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/b1d79707-59b2-4dc0-9d15-49b5ec4...


Delivering double digit IPC improvements (looks like the industry is still competitive). > The Arm C1 Ultra CPU aims for +25% single-threaded performance and double-digit IPC gains

The new Mali GPU's look not bad too with +20% performance while 9% more power efficient.

And SME2-enabled Armv9.3 cores for on device AI doesn’t sound bad either


this is going to be a killer in the cloud, when it lands in graviton cpus


It is not clear on which core the successor of Neoverse V3 (the server version of Cortex-X4, which is used in the latest Graviton) will be based.

Arm C1-Ultra is the successor of Cortex-X925. C1-Ultra has great improvements in single-thread performance, but Cortex-X925 had very poor performance per die area, which made it totally unsuitable for server CPUs. Arm has not said anything about the performance per area of C1-Ultra, so I assume that it continues to be poor.

Arm C1-Pro is the successor of Cortex-A725. Arm has made server versions of the Cortex-A7xx, but Amazon did not like them for Gravitons, for being too weak.

Therefore only Arm C1-Premium could have a server derivative that would become the successor of Neoverse V3 for a future Graviton.

For now, the technical manual of C1-Premium is very sparse. Only when the optimization guide for C1-Premium will be published, showing its microarchitecture, we will know whether it is a worthy replacement for Cortex-X4/Neoverse V3, which had the best performance per die area among the previous Arm CPU cores.


Today I'm showcasing my open source (written in Go) Telegram bot that does a few things that are nice to have for group chats:

1. Clean any URL of Tracking Parameters

2. Parse TikTok (Videos / Photos), Instagram (Reels / Posts), Twitter/X (All posts) in a way that you don’t need to leave the Telegram App to view the content. This utilizes either open source tools like FxEmbed to switch the domain or for tiktok photos attaches them as a gallery reply.

There’s an extensive list of rules https://github.com/HeyMeco/Sanitized-TG-URL-Bot/blob/main/ru... that are being used to accomplish this.

We've used this happily for months now and from feedback I know it’s being used in bigger channels too. As I do no logging I cannot say more about its popularity.

You can add it to your group chat or channel from this link: https://t.me/sanitizeurlbot


Agree, with the HDR marketing for the Switch 2 I expected a proper implementation. Sad that they cheaped out on it but at least we got this great article out of it


Yup


Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: