It's quite unfortunate, a lot of people or organisations I am interested in - AI for example - only post on X, and perhaps it's only a matter of time until services like bird.makeup also get taken down. Also, accessibility wise it's sad too, X's web interface is not the best out there and without login you cannot do really much.
If AI really is democratizing technology, it won’t be long before we get back to everyone having a personal website.
I remember blowing everyone’s mind when i wrote a php script to scrape my bands myspace to keep our website up to date with show details. It was like a magic trick.
That sort of power is in the hands of the masses now, they just don’t know it yet.
> The company on Wednesday confirmed speculation that the Ox Alpha model is a new iteration of its GLM series and said it will release the weights for it tonight, in response to queries by Bloomberg News.
Seems legit.
It's really hard to know how good it is. So much hype around it.
Nobody (with the probable exception of Anthropic given their work on character training) really trains models on their identity and Claude is the only AI persona that's well-defined so if you put yourself into the AI's shoes it's a pretty reasonable guess that it might be Claude. I've had basically every open model claim it's Claude when the topic comes up.
Anthropic changed their character training policy many times, and the name is probably separate from it anyway (besides the bits from the constitution etc). Name training usually comes last in all models, if at all, and it's pretty shallow. Certain Claude models say they are Qwen or Deepseek when asked in Chinese, for example.
Yeah, Claude is actually surprisingly unsure of his identity considering that their most recent publication on their constitutional AI training literally had graphs demonstrating how certain properties differed based on whether they were phrased as questions about "Claude" versus "You", but it's actually that which makes me fairly confident that they're probably doing _something_ to try and close that gap.
More generally, their current approach to constitutional AI pretty much only makes sense if they believe that they can first teach the model what the Claude character is like and also teach the model that the persona responding is Claude, so I figure that has to be part of the pipeline even if they're not very good at it.
Anthropic is careful about buying capacity, and too conservative given their explosive growth. That compares favorably with OpenAI and its Monopoly money Ponzi scheme approach, which will blow up sooner or later.
