This sucks out the joy of Open Source development, which is freedom to do anything, change anything and not responsible for anyone else.

At the point you require payments, users can have expectations and requests, which turns your project into a job.

In this case the joy was already sucked out a while ago by entitled users.

It sounds like you maintain a successful Open Source project. :)

I have a rule for Claude Code to disallow deleting anyhting:

    "deny": [ "Bash(rm:*)" ]

I don't understand why people only think in extremes.

You don't have to give up anything you did before at all.

LLMs just here to increase your productivity, but cranking out unreviewed code where you don't want to do that is just silly to me.

It is composable with all decades old Linux CLI tools, which you simply can't do with an IDE.

It also doesn't prevent you from using an IDE at all, but still fits for people with text editors like Vim who doesn't want to use IDEs.

AGI is a scam. I'm pretty sure every big name in AI knows it's nowhere near and LLMs won't get us there. It's just marketing helping Sam and alike to get those billions and the hype alive.

Why don't use your own personal access token?

We did, bur ran into the API limits as oder/scorecard alone is quite expensive on GitHub request

Implement an OAuth flow with Github and then you can avoid that entirely.

Gods point, will work on that!

The only thing crazier than asking for a personal access token is that people probably do it.

Codex is just terrible

This is simply not true. All personal paid packages include Claude Code now.

Are you using CC for your python framework?

MCP was specifically created so LLMs can have a better understanding (better context). An app or user needs completely different endpoints than LLMs.