Having used GLM-5.3 I honestly don't think it is better than 5.1. It is slower and the result is often overengineered, it is if it overthinks everything.
Well it is just a bit of fun I think. However, I also think an AGI or an extremely capable model approaching AGI would be able to paint a pelican on a bicycle fairly easily. So in that way it is a good metric.
The overregulation and the constant attempt to destroy any notion of privacy has really pushed me towards being anti EU. I wonder if ressources are spent seeding that sentiment.
To be clear, this will also happen in the USA. The destruction of privacy is perhaps the only issue with full throated support across the political spectrum.
I hope this is successful, like it or not this might be one of the best ways that Linux can reduce the Microsoft Windows monopoly. I would actually go as far as to say that it has to succeed.
Last time I read about them (here in HN) somebody highlighted that the problem wasn’t to get them to function at a high refresh rate, the problem is they stop being energy effecient at that rate. Now I mostly skimmed the article but I couldn’t find any information regarding that.
Cool, what is the price pr. Million token. I am using a 300 t/s model for a project I am doing and speed is crucial over precision, so this seems like an upgrade. However if it is 10$ pr. M tokens then it is not worth an upgrade.
reply