Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Consumer choice is, indeed, the underpinning of the free market.

What is preventing other companies to come to market with cheaper versions of the EpiPen? Why are there no cheaper alternatives?



I believe there are three alternatives: Epipen, Adrenaclick, and Twinject. The FDA does not allow pharmacists to substitute one for the other at the pharmacy, and many (doctors and patients) opt for the best-known brand.


A-ha! This is new information to me. Why are EpiPen substitutes not allowed? Are the products that different?


> Why are EpiPen substitutes not allowed?

My understanding is if the prescription says "EpiPen" (or any non-generic drug brand name) the pharmacist must provide an EpiPen (or the brand-name drug). If the prescription says "epinephrine auto injector" or "EpiPen or generic," then the substitution is allowed.

> Are the products that different?

IIRC, they all the current alternatives deliver the same medicine, but they use different injector mechanisms to do so. I think the last alternative withdrew from the US market for some reason, because their mechanism wasn't as reliable with dosing.

IIRC, EpiPen's mechanism is apparently off-patent, so a true generic could enter the market if approved.


Scott Alexander covered that topic nicely:

http://slatestarcodex.com/2016/08/29/reverse-voxsplaining-dr...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: