Movies and music video mix in footage from real life. In fact, they're mostly footage of real life.
It's interesting that it's so easy to fool us when they use that technique, but 100% simulated video is the tempting target.
To put it differently, if the goal is to render a laptop, movies and TV shows cheat by filming an actual laptop and overlaying the footage. Whereas our goal is to synthesize a laptop.
You don't put a limit on the length of the video: any movie or music video with 2 or more sequential frames of completely synthetic footage disproves your claim.
Do you think composing real footage and generated together doesn't count? What about two generated sources?
> they're mostly footage of real life.
Historically, yes. Modern-day, most blockbusters heavily rely on generated video.
You have made your point abundantly clear; I am trying to show you that your desired state has already happened and you probably didn't notice, and to get you to clarify what it is you're looking for, and why.
Plenty of people have. How would you spot it in a movie or music video?