I agree it should be mentioned on that page too ("up to" would probably get them... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		bhj on Oct 16, 2017 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: The impossible dream of USB-C I agree it should be mentioned on that page too ("up to" would probably get them out of any false advertising claims). It's doubly confusing because there are 13" models with only 2 ports vs 4.

fishywang on Oct 16, 2017 [–]

I don't know how "up to" works legally (IANAL). Can they claim "up to 80 Gbps" when the maximum they can achieve is 40 Gbps and get away with it?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact