Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So many studies make such bald and ridiculous assumptions but never get called out for them. Or the results of "studies" where the methods aren't even public!

Linking to a "study" to validate a point is so easy and trivial. I can find studies that validate any position I need. But having "a study show" makes my argument seem truthful and academic. In that regard, "studies" seem to have a cargo cult where people happy collect and link to them but never bother to validate them.

Did they not bother to actually run the numbers by anyone at all? Did it being a "study" magically make it pure and true?



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: