Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think the point is that they could have just installed the malware since they had physical possession for an entire year.


And the counterpoint is that he'd obviously got a new computer and any further surveillance would benefit from access to that one.


That's a good point. I was assuming the old hard drive was loaded on old equipment but that's not necessarily the case.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: