Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Sarno comes up on HN with some frequency, and I never understood why. AFAIK there is no good evidence that the "tension myositis syndrome" he describes even exists, or that his treatments are much better than placebo. I one of his books, I think "The Mind/Body Connection", and found it to be very new-agey. It basically amounted to "be kind to yourself and forgive others and your body will feel better". Maybe there is some truth to that, but it's been decades without good evidence?


It's because it works.

I had completely debilitating RSI where I could only use one hand at a time to type for 15m at a time before I had shooting pain all the way up my arm to my shoulder. His solution (which admittedly does sound like new-agey bullshit) took me from that to zero pain in 3 weeks. I have no idea if his syndrome exists or not, but his solution worked for me which is really all that matters.

Granted, I did not do an in-depth look into the evidence backing his arguments but I did find the argument of referred pain to be compelling, if not robustly proven. (e.g. the lack of existence of RSI in the time of typewriters, the increase in incidence of ulcers as soon as they were tied to stress by medical literature, physical back pain manifesting in some but not others with the same physical symptoms showing in MRI, etc)


I don't fully buy his exact theory either, but it doesn't matter -- it cured my wrist pain anyway. The specific mechanism of action is less important than the core premises, which are:

1. My brain is capable of generating the sensation of pain in various parts of my body.

2. My brain has been conditioned to generate pain automatically (and unconsciously) in response to certain stimuli.

3. It is possible to recondition my brain to remove this automatic response.

The surrounding body of theories and recommendations are just methods for accepting these premises and completing the reconditioning process. For most people, accepting the "diagnosis" is the hardest part. The pain feels very real and very much caused by structural problems in the body. Personally, it was only after I had accumulated a sufficient set of evidence ("the nature and exact location of my pain is not consistent," "a nerve conduction study found nothing wrong," etc.) that I was able to begin reconditioning. The turning point came when, after I started to see some reduction in pain, I began experiencing strange symptoms in other parts of the body (e.g. headaches, which are rare for me). This aligned perfectly with what Sarno's book said would happen. After that, I was able to "buy in" 100% and the rest of my pain was gone within a few weeks.

I suggest reading Aaron Iba's blog post on the subject; it's what convinced me to give it a try: https://aaroniba.net/how-i-cured-my-rsi-pain


I've too posted multiple times about Sarno because by just reading his books I got cured of my years of chronic back pain (I think it was more than 11 years of pain doing physiotherapy, yoga, pain meds, ayurveda, etc none of which helped me for long).

It had gotten to the point where I couldn't sit for 1 hour or pick my daughter up.

Pain is all I could think about waking up to before sleeping.

Then I read this comment on HN and my life changed. All I had to do is read Sarno's book and even before I could finish it I was feeling a lot better. It was like a decade of pain leave my body in 2 days. Though it does take time after that to learn how to get totally pain free.

I'm glad to say that someone else too read my comment on HN and posted that he was thinking of ending his life due to immense back pain but he too had a similar experience like me after reading the book and feels almost cured.

It's also not placebo either since I'm pain free for almost 3 years now.


Sarno comes up because what he suggests works. It did for me back in 2001 when nothing else did.


I think he got the right answer the wrong way.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: