This is not that great of an article, IMO. A prominent developer of one of the roguelikes mentioned says:
> you can immediately see that this article was stitched together by throwing some wikipedia articles together if it references the Berlin interpretation
> it's also hilarious if the guild of disgruntled adventurers is referenced as fun addition :)
> I'm not sure if I should feel insulted [by the article's description of my roguelike]
I mostly agree with these. I also feel a bit slighted by one of the descriptions. I'm also not sure quite what to make of the fact that they don't mention the two most prominent recent roguelikes: caves of qud, and cogmind.
> you can immediately see that this article was stitched together by throwing some wikipedia articles together if it references the Berlin interpretation
> it's also hilarious if the guild of disgruntled adventurers is referenced as fun addition :)
> I'm not sure if I should feel insulted [by the article's description of my roguelike]
I mostly agree with these. I also feel a bit slighted by one of the descriptions. I'm also not sure quite what to make of the fact that they don't mention the two most prominent recent roguelikes: caves of qud, and cogmind.