Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You shouldn’t take your opinions on things from HN discussions that claim that Rust is changing quickly, and then are only able to point out 3 things over 5 years that have changed.


I don't. Crate authors seems to be playing catch up to, or more likely, abandon their old work. I'ts really hard coming in to Rust to get a feel for what to use in any given situation as the crates are either dead or in alpha.


Can you point to any evidence that abandoned crates are abandoned due to language changes (as opposed to lost interest by the author, for example)?

Code written for Rust 1.0 will most probably still work perfectly fine today.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: