If it was a regulatory requirement, then they should have been put in to receive... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

mike_d on Feb 2, 2021 | parent | context | favorite | on: It’s Time for Real Time Settlement

If it was a regulatory requirement, then they should have been put in to receivership immediately. Being unable to meet colleterial requirements means they extended credit beyond their means.

ABeeSea on Feb 2, 2021 [–]

They never went over the threshold because they turned off buying for the most volatile stocks.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact