Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It is pretty crazy.

I worked for a large organisation where management was far closer to 'technology leaders' and 'technology strategists' than engineering and data science principles and leads. They would endlessly swoop in to our division asking us to assess another product they have bought to fix the legacy problems of multiple data sources.

All of them were brittle af. They all anticipated a very idealistic data source and the absence of non-technical people curating data in excel ten different ways.

Even though we were the data science team, we usually ended up providing far more value to the organisation because we could do data engineering and cleaning and ended up being the source of truth for a lot of data required by the wider organisation. We got pitched dozens of sexy solutions to fix all our ETL problems, but when we started asking questions it was always seemed like a well designed custom pipeline couldn't be beaten for both data quality assurance, reliability and speed.



That's exactly why we are approaching the problem with open source. It changes the dynamic of how it gets adopted. we've been in your shoes where a tool is being pushed Top-Down and now you have to deal with a super complex, super expensive, rigid & half working product.

Instead Airbyte gets adopted by engineers, data scientist... to solve one problem and then the usage expands from there. We can improve the product based on the feedback we get from the real users.

And if a feature, a connector is not there, anyone can actually add it!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: