It seems the dissenters here aren't able to separate the art from the artist. It's not a view I can respect, but one I can understand.
Here's a hint, whether a regulation passes through a democratic process or through authoritarian decree, it's the same rule at the end of the day, and should be judged on its own merits.
Everybody dissenting here has provided no rebuke or detailed response, just seemingly uninformed quips. I'd rather hold discussion to a higher standard of objectivity, personally
