Many misconceptions in the article. It is a good example of an apples to oranges comparison.
Kubernetes is first and foremost an orchestrator.
Docker is an environment. You can run Redis, proxies and all kind of infrastructure in Docker containers. Or your own binaries.
The article is making a valid point in distributing binaries. That's all. Nothing new here. If WASM will conquer the world - we'll see. Potential is there. But WASM for the browser was already overhyped. Hype seems necessary in our times but is clearly not enough.
Kubernetes is first and foremost an orchestrator.
Docker is an environment. You can run Redis, proxies and all kind of infrastructure in Docker containers. Or your own binaries.
The article is making a valid point in distributing binaries. That's all. Nothing new here. If WASM will conquer the world - we'll see. Potential is there. But WASM for the browser was already overhyped. Hype seems necessary in our times but is clearly not enough.