But in order to do 'bring privacy to masses', don't you think they need familiar features? Otherwise it's just 'oh that weird crypto privacy nerd chat app' that the masses don't want to use.
What "familiar features" is Signal missing? Honest question. It has reactions, groups, stickers (wish they linked signalstickers.org so you can get more from inside the app), replies, etc. I don't see anything that WA or iMessage has that Signal doesn't. I know WA has statuses, but every time I look at it none of my friends have posted one. Telegram has channels, but do we really need that?
I honestly don't know what these features are. The only thing I hear from normal people is stickers and "but none of my friends are there." This is a genuine question because I can't figure out what others have that Signal doesn't.
For starters, others don't lose all your messages if your phone breaks and allow you to actually send messages from desktop and tablet platforms without constantly breaking and losing data.
The "backup" system Signal has is a joke for everyone outside the paranoid community. Every messaging platform has a single chance of losing users data before they switch away. Signal does it constantly.
You should be setting a two-week auto-delete for all your messages anyway. Archive and backup features in other apps are a massive privacy hole. These chats are supposed to be ephemeral, if you want long lasting comms that you can search through later, use email.
The idea of any of my contacts logging every message I ever sent to them, and backing them up in clear text on whatever dumb cloud provider they're using this week, is a pretty scary one.
Please stop telling me and my family what to do with our private messages. If you want to destroy them immediately, that's fine. But stop demanding that Signal destroys pictures and messages my grandmother cares about without her own input.
This arrogance is the worst cancer on "privacy" software. Essence of privacy is _control_ over data, not destruction.
Not sure I agree with this. The problem is I don’t know what I’ll need later until I need it… old messages from months or years ago that I never expected to need have saved me multiple times for a variety of reasons by now.
It’s also awkward to try to herd a conversation partner from chat to email at some arbitrary point when you think the conversation is veering in a direction where preservation is important.
I use Signal as my main messaging app now, but even for the contacts on there I have to fall back to Whatsapp to share our live locations in order to find each other. Doesn't happen very often but it is a useful feature that it is missing.
Don't iPhone and Android make it super trivial to get a live location link from the maps app that you can drop in the chat? I know Android does. Seems weird to put it directly into an encrypted messaging app when it's native to the OS.
I'm on Android and didn't know I could do that. Now I realise that you can, its just buried a little bit. Signal also lets you share photos directly from the app; I don't have to go to another app on the phone and share from there, so it does seem like a different UX route compared to what I'd expect.
Do people really need minutely updates on your bike ride? What value does it add to anyone's life to know what exact block you're on for the next 15 seconds?
Just tell them your final destination verbally, and you're done.
Maybe they were riding in a group and one of them stopped to take photos and lost the rest of them. Now they want to see where everyone else is and catch up to them.
Sometimes its about the journey, not the destination.
"I am about 200 feet southeast of the large monument in the center of the park, wearing a red shirt"
"From the XYZ Street beach entrance, we're about 100 yards north, with a blue umbrella."
Using realtime GPS tracking for this sort of thing is fetishizing technology to overoptimize a problem that was trivially solved for millenia using verbal offsets from known landmarks, while at the same time introducing and normalizing grave privacy concerns in society.
Good luck at long beaches where there are endless swaths of identical copy-paste tress, tents, deck chairs and umbrellas, without any unique elements to use as bearings. I would hate to have to send people on wild goose chases in the hot sun.
>wearing a red shirt
You've obviously never experienced how difficult it is to be found by your friends if you're short in a crowd of tall people at a concert or any sort of wide festival/gathering. Telling people what color your shirt is doesn't do anything to help if they can't see you until they're within 1m of you. And that's without it being dark at night. It's like finding Waldo IRL but more difficult.
>
fetishizing technology to overoptimize a problem that was trivially solved for millenia
Ok Fred Flintstone, you do you, just let me enjoy the modern comforts of current technical achievements please and you feel free to follow the stars and buffalo tracks with your friends.
I mean people used to do this all the time. I sure did.it isn't that hard and is often more accurate than GPS, but I do get your point. For what its worth signal does have location sharing.it just doesn't update.
You can easily send a location pin. Yes I realize this isn't constantly updating, but seems enough to meet 90% (number pulled out of my ass) of the use cases.
I like the social impact of real-time disclosure of my location. I’d rather share my location for an hour with someone that I’m meeting than send them periodic messages guessing about how far away I am.
I think Apple has done a really good job with this — you can share your location for an hour, the rest of the day, or forever. I use the “share for an hour” option all the time.
Telegram has a bot API that is great. I use it for a lot of Projects. Used to be a niche feature I guess, but nowadays I see a LOT of people using some bot for some specific feature.
The ability to forward more than one photo at a time. When someone reacts to a message I get a notification but there's no way of determining what message has been reacted to. The backup system to restore messages when changing phones is fragile and something I have to help less technical friends / family members with.
> The ability to forward more than one photo at a time
This is already possible (on Android at least), and has been for a long while.
Long press on one, press "select" which allows you to select other photos, select the photos you like, and then press forward.
One issue with that is that if multiple photos are grouped together, you have to select the whole group, but you can definitely forward multiple photos in one go.
Sorry, I meant forward from an existing message. So if I want to share a bunch of photos from one group to another, I dont believe theres any way to select multiple photos (on iOS at least).
Who are these older/less technical users that can't store text or images outside of an encrypted conversation, but somehow are still agile enough to search back through lengthy conversation histories?
I dont think I did a very good job of explaining what I mean. Im talking about the process to transfer Signal from one phone to another. In my experience it involves placing the phones near one another and transferring over bluetooth (I think) and this process has failed for me a number of times - a scary experience!
I don't use it, (I wish everyone used it or something similar, but nobody I know does, or certainly didn't when I last tried it and it was nothing like that, just SMS-like) so I can't speak to that, but my impression up-thread was that that was exactly the sort of thing people were wishing it wouldn't (have) focus(sed) on.
