OP said that subtle clues are inferior, and even useless, compare to direct communication.
In your response, you said indirect, subtle communication is better, but your reason is that it is pointless.
You claim people can never improve, or, that helping them is pointless.
In this scenario, you are not arguing that subtly is better, you are arguing that nothing is better.
Yet by your metric, there is no logic in pointing this out...
OP said that subtle clues are inferior, and even useless, compare to direct communication.
In your response, you said indirect, subtle communication is better, but your reason is that it is pointless.
You claim people can never improve, or, that helping them is pointless.
In this scenario, you are not arguing that subtly is better, you are arguing that nothing is better.
Yet by your metric, there is no logic in pointing this out...