Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What's your rationale for declaring it false?

The exact quote is:

>"We are excited to see RISC-V solutions for wearable and consumer devices becoming a reality, and we are looking at possibilities of integrating SiFive’s latest products into Snapdragon platforms,” said Ziad Asghar, Vice President, Product Management- Snapdragon Technologies and Roadmap at Qualcomm.

edit: I meant "Qualcomm will likely push RISC-V hard, thus not choose ARM ISA at all, from now on." -- My bad.



Read what you said again and particularly 'at all from now on'.

And please take note of what I'm saying. You really don't do your cause any favours with this approach.


choose ARM vs use ARM.

i.e. they will not be using ARM by choice anymore.

Unfortunately, I cannot edit the parent post anymore; As it's often the case, it's easy to miss things even when re-reading your own comments.

It was blatantly obvious when reading it again now.

To get back on topic... you said:

>Qualcomm wants to use IP that was 100% developed by Arm

And then I told you,

>You mean the ISA? Qualcomm has a license to the ISA that allows them to make and sell custom microarchitectures. They had it before they acquired Nuvia.

You have not addressed that, at all.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: