I really liked the reference to platonism at the beginning.
I feel like at times our problems in the west can be rooted in relying to much in Aristotle and empiricism and not enough on platonic thinking (you could swing too far one way though).
DDD’s ubiquitous language IS the key as he says. Political discourse is the king of lacking ubiquitous language, though that seems more intentional, so we can use words intentionally meaning different things to one group or another. The result though is an inability to work out problems. Engineering organizations at least are not intentionally using different language, but the result is the same, an inability to solve problems.
I feel like at times our problems in the west can be rooted in relying to much in Aristotle and empiricism and not enough on platonic thinking (you could swing too far one way though).
DDD’s ubiquitous language IS the key as he says. Political discourse is the king of lacking ubiquitous language, though that seems more intentional, so we can use words intentionally meaning different things to one group or another. The result though is an inability to work out problems. Engineering organizations at least are not intentionally using different language, but the result is the same, an inability to solve problems.