I don’t think it was “intentional” so to speak (not that it has intention anyway, so it isn’t clear what distinction I’m trying to make there). But regardless, I’d say it actually succeeded at humor (the contrast of the “clever wordplay” it describes with the lame example is actually pretty funny).
And the idea that the computer would “try” to come up with an example that would trick a computer is itself a little funny, in that it has fallen into giving itself a preposterous task.
>And the idea that the computer would “try” to come up with an example that would trick a computer is itself a little funny
There sure is some obscure discussion forum where users talked about that or some amateur writer that published online something in those lines. ChatGPT is just a statistical device selecting randomly from previous answers.
And the idea that the computer would “try” to come up with an example that would trick a computer is itself a little funny, in that it has fallen into giving itself a preposterous task.
But it did definitely fail at clever wordplay.