> Software engineers and the like are too-frequently technology fetishists that are like the proverbial guy who has a hammer and thinks everything is a nail.
Irrelevant even if true.
> Even if "innovative games with cool interfaces" is the right way to educate kids, which is very unlikely to be true,
Presumably baseless personal opinion offered without even attempting to provide support.
> those games aren't going to be spat out by ChatGPT.
This is just easily demonstrated to be false already.
> And if they can be spat out by ChatGPT, why even bother educating most of those kids at all?
Irrelevant even if true.
> Even if "innovative games with cool interfaces" is the right way to educate kids, which is very unlikely to be true,
Presumably baseless personal opinion offered without even attempting to provide support.
> those games aren't going to be spat out by ChatGPT.
This is just easily demonstrated to be false already.
> And if they can be spat out by ChatGPT, why even bother educating most of those kids at all?
Dramatic Irony