Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Senators get OP with longevity. Having a bunch of old senators is an emergent behavior of the rules of the Senate.


Is this true, or are these just benefits of someone who has been in the Senate for 30 years having good working relationships with 70 other Senators, and the branch new Senator being lucky to know one or two?

Put another way, what rules of the Senate benefit length of service over anything else?



I don't personally think age is really the problem - mental (and to some extent, physical) abilities are, however.

There's the good 80 years old, and then there's the bad 80 years old. We all know it when we see it... and we're watching it in real time in multiple places within our federal government right now.

We, as a country, are about to face this very same question again, as President Biden is expected to announce his re-election bid shortly. Are we OK with that as a country, given his obvious decline in the past few years? Objectively, and without red or blue coloring, he's not the Joe Biden of 2008.

So, what do we do?


This is going to be an unpopular opinion, but I don't want people born before Hitler rose to power to be in the government at all. I don't care how sharp you are and I don't care how progressive or conservative you are.

If you're old enough to have had strong opinions about LBJ when he was in office, your time has passed and we really don't need you in the Senate, or the White House, or anywhere else in government making decisions that will have impacts decades after you're gone.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: