Your whole reply appears, to me, to be completely unhinged, but this bit:
> They will learn that "slowing down the rate of change" is a dog whistle for denying the rights of a human being because their parents told them they were a girl.
does make me ask ... What on earth are you talking about?
I’m not GP, but the post seemed off to me too and there’s likely more going on that is generalized to the entire conversation.
There’s way more kind loving parents working to help their children flourish than denying their human being rights. And stopping the loving ones to also stop the jerks seems like a net negative impact change.
> They will learn that "slowing down the rate of change" is a dog whistle for denying the rights of a human being because their parents told them they were a girl.
does make me ask ... What on earth are you talking about?