Could be, but that wasn't the argument. The argument was, that fish has nice auto-completion, and that could be done without $irrelevant_feature_list.
(Also, by the same token, Powershell isn't Windows.)
> stating that Powershell just mimics existing popular bash/zsh means your not aware of Powershell capabilities versus bash/zsh.
So what does it better than bash/zsh in the area of code completion? Simple tab completion? For history, Ctrl-R and F7? Woo-hoo.
> Since when do bash/zsh offer a full sane programming language, not relying in external executables, (...)
Which is completely irrelevant when we are discussing code completion.
Powershell Core is less Windows, that I grant you.
As for code-completion, if you so insist, I don't see anything better on Fish that is so great about it.
I also don't install needless stuff like oh-my-posh, I don't need jumping rainbows and what not on my shell.
Could be, but that wasn't the argument. The argument was, that fish has nice auto-completion, and that could be done without $irrelevant_feature_list.
(Also, by the same token, Powershell isn't Windows.)
> stating that Powershell just mimics existing popular bash/zsh means your not aware of Powershell capabilities versus bash/zsh.
So what does it better than bash/zsh in the area of code completion? Simple tab completion? For history, Ctrl-R and F7? Woo-hoo.
> Since when do bash/zsh offer a full sane programming language, not relying in external executables, (...)
Which is completely irrelevant when we are discussing code completion.