Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

1. I agree it sounds a little abnormal, but it makes sense to me. Why are you so quick to write "open sources" off as error (or fabrication)?

2. from google re: exploit - 1. Make full use of and derive benefit from (a resource): "500 companies sprang up to exploit this new technology".



1) Because it's not correct. It's "open source".

2) Sure, but it makes you cringe as a tech person, and sounds just like the kind of thing a non-native speaker would have written that's technically correct, but doesn't really sound quite right.


Both `open sources` and `exploited` have precise meanings in this context. A quick proofread by someone familiar with Linus would have removed these two mistakes.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: