Tweeting screenshots of text demonstrates how poor a platform Twitter is, IMO. A core feature -- sharing text -- must sometimes be done in the least efficient way possible, as an image or a series of tweets (that can only be viewed while signed in).
> must sometimes be done in the least efficient way possible, as an image or a series of tweets
Try tiktok and instagram, they’re to kids these days what twitter was to us 10 years ago. There’s a huge trend on those platforms of people sharing a single tweet as a 20s video with a face grimacing and pointing at the text as commentary.
Literally 280char of content turned into a 20s full screen selfie video.
There's also a much higher character limit for paying users, so you can post an entire essay in a tweet now. Look at basically everything Bill Ackman[1] posts, for example.
"Yeah, the best content is on twitter, you have everything from links to Medium to links to personal websites, sometimes there's even screenshots of them!"
You know how Stallman browses the web by emailing a scraper that replies only the text? And he avoids all the Medium flurry of popups and overlays and trackers and cookies and other rubbish?
Seeing a screenshot of the text in Twitter accidentally does that too, and provides a better experience than visiting the site for anyone who doesn't need to customise the text for readability.
Can you please not cross into arguing that way, regardless of how wrong others are or you feel they are? I know how frustrating it can be to defend a minority position (believe me I know this well), but even in that case the onus is on you to remain thoughtful and respectful. If you're feeling to strongly to do that, this is understandable, but in that case please wait to post until you can.
What do you learn from 280 characters at a time?