Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why only those two options? It could be just "the company had other priorities and developers, while they appreciated Travis's work, didn't find it worthwhile to carry the torch themselves". Having a great testing framework is just one of the things that need devs' attention.


Fair point, it's a false dichotomy; though your example is close to "the org wasn't ready for it," which is itself vague.

Maybe the issue is that it easily comes apart without a dedicated censor, so to speak, and nobody wanted to have that role.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: