> This is indeed twice as fast as the vectorized implementation, but, disappoint... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		davedx 9 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: I don't like NumPy > This is indeed twice as fast as the vectorized implementation, but, disappointingly, the naive implementation with loops is even faster. On CPU or GPU?

kccqzy 9 months ago [–]

This is NumPy we are discussing. It doesn't use the GPU.

threeducks 9 months ago | [–]

To be fair, you could replace `import numpy as np` with `import cupy as np` and it would run on GPU without further changes. It is not any good though. PyTorch is roughly 12 times faster.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact