Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"Good" vs "bad" was not intended to be an existential question about whether some bot-powered activity like AI training will be a net good or bad 20 or 100 years from now.

It's not even a question of whether, in that particular case, AI will displace some forms of human labor, even if that causes a macroeconomic crisis where society needs to figure out a better way to operate in light of new AI-driven economic realities.

It's a simple question of whether internet bots are causing economic inefficiencies and mis-allocation of resources in the classical sense.

The bad bots, discussed in the article, are. AI scraping bots are not. All it takes to see this are all the mentions of fraud in this HN thread. Bad bots are, at their core, fundamentally fraudulent in how they interact with sites. That fraud is compounded into how companies realizing the extent of that fraud react: by hiding or lying to investors and boards, because the fraudulent bot activity has significantly altered market perception. Nothing about pure scrapers is fraudulent, regardless of whether their ultimate goals are good or bad for the economy or humanity, if that could even be known.



Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: