The first study also shows there was basically no detectable vaccine mRNA outside of lymphatic germinal centers, which contradicts your following claims. Almost as if you can't cherry-pick study statements to make some argument.
The “following” are not my claims but quotes from the studies, which are independent of each other and free to make their own claims. My claim (if I made one) is that we were misled about how much we know whether the jab stays at the injection site and degrades quickly. I have not contradicted myself.
Or people genuinely believed to have a solid understanding of something, but later evidence changed that? I mean, most people are "misled" on every topic, if that boils down to being underinformed. School also misled you about biology, physics and chemistry. How do you feel about that?
But sure, it may be evidence of some grand conspiracy to genetically turn white people gay, or something.
