> I can't fathom how someone designed these things and though, yep, this is a good experience.
My 2 cents: it's the typical "lab" test. It overall looks cool if you think about it, on paper. In reality, they should test with children inside (potentially screaming, because that's what they do!), while pedestrians/bikes are outside near the street so you need to pay particular attention, the traffic light is turning red, and at the same time you need to open the windows to let that f** wasp out, that somehow was inside the car. I wanna see how cool that is. If there are UX standards for accessibility, why aren't there patterns about such things? Oh, right, maybe there are, and someone wants to "innovate" :)
This is the kind of distractions that really can lead to accidents, because you need to actually "watch" whether something got activated or not.
EDIT: my comment was for the other comment that mentioned the buttons for the windows :) somehow I clicked on the wrong "reply". It still applies, though!
My 2 cents: it's the typical "lab" test. It overall looks cool if you think about it, on paper. In reality, they should test with children inside (potentially screaming, because that's what they do!), while pedestrians/bikes are outside near the street so you need to pay particular attention, the traffic light is turning red, and at the same time you need to open the windows to let that f** wasp out, that somehow was inside the car. I wanna see how cool that is. If there are UX standards for accessibility, why aren't there patterns about such things? Oh, right, maybe there are, and someone wants to "innovate" :)
This is the kind of distractions that really can lead to accidents, because you need to actually "watch" whether something got activated or not.
EDIT: my comment was for the other comment that mentioned the buttons for the windows :) somehow I clicked on the wrong "reply". It still applies, though!