Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

other people in the thread say that posix_spawn is more or less implemented as a fork+exec wrapper though? it sounds like the idea is more like if there were a separate deferred_fork that made an intermediate "process factory" that let you set up a process without actually creating a new one until the exec. obviously the if() construct would have to be replaced with an in-process handle that mimics calls to the posix api.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: