> They are also more likely to be dumber and lacking in versatility.
I think you mean 'naive' or 'inexperienced'. Stupidity ('dumb' isn't PC, but nobody seems to care anyway) is generally thought of as something inherent.
Could be interpreted as a darwinian selection pressure such that there are smart and dumb noobs, but by the time they're old timers, only the smart ones remain.
(Insert Peter principle jokes, who goes into management jokes, etc)
I think you mean 'naive' or 'inexperienced'. Stupidity ('dumb' isn't PC, but nobody seems to care anyway) is generally thought of as something inherent.