> The collection of foreign private commercial information or trade secrets is authorized only to protect the
> national security of the United States or its partners and allies. It is not an authorized foreign intelligence
> or counterintelligence purpose to collect such information to afford a competitive advantage
can you tell me where the change is? The document reads more of a "hey trust me, we're really the good guys"
EDIT: since i can't reply. it's all about thinking and discussing if dissemination and retention makes sense. and reducing people that have access to it. and we may put a special person in charge to take care of these things. but that doesn't mean at&t will suddenly stop feeding data into nsa data centers.
> The collection of foreign private commercial information or trade secrets is authorized only to protect the > national security of the United States or its partners and allies. It is not an authorized foreign intelligence > or counterintelligence purpose to collect such information to afford a competitive advantage
can you tell me where the change is? The document reads more of a "hey trust me, we're really the good guys"
http://sina.is/2014sigint.mem_.ppd_.rel_.pdf
care to explain where the real change is?
EDIT: since i can't reply. it's all about thinking and discussing if dissemination and retention makes sense. and reducing people that have access to it. and we may put a special person in charge to take care of these things. but that doesn't mean at&t will suddenly stop feeding data into nsa data centers.