> Are we really supposed to cater to the sub 2% that chooses not to use javascript?
In my opinion: No.
JavaScript should be treated as default feature of the browser now. It's about as worth the effort as catering to people who want to use Lynx as their browser.
The screen reader argument is bogus too, modern screen reader software is not hampered by JS.
I also wonder if those who disable JS because of the increased attack surface also disable CSS as well.
In my opinion: No.
JavaScript should be treated as default feature of the browser now. It's about as worth the effort as catering to people who want to use Lynx as their browser.
The screen reader argument is bogus too, modern screen reader software is not hampered by JS.
I also wonder if those who disable JS because of the increased attack surface also disable CSS as well.