If you do not have insurance, do not have means of payment, yes they will not provide treatment. You cannot be denied in an emergency room, but you're not looking to get emergency room cancer treatment.
> The cancers and many other diseases have the best chances to be treated in the US.
If you can pay for treatment. That's why it's a false comparison.
> How is that better?
Do you want capitalism? Then the cost is that you have to pay to get the 90% chance. I'm highlighting, this is what you said you wanted, and you have it available to you.
I'd ALSO like to have 60% chance to people who can't pay the outrageous fees involved.
> EU is great at being mediocre.
No. Absolutely incorrect. EU is great at being mediocre, if you as an individual can't afford more.
You absolutely have the opportunity to achieve the highest peaks of the United States. You can BUY that 90%, if you can afford it.
So, EU has a mediocre low (taxpayer provided), and the highest peaks (if you can afford it.)
The US has the lowest valleys, and the highest peaks (if you can afford it.)
> Or do you think that everybody should have the same chances no matter what they do in their lives?
You're presenting the false alternative. If you can afford better treatment, you can buy better treatment.
> Put your foot where your mouth is!
I vote.
> They deny them entry? How does it look like "technically" ?
Roughly like what it looks like when you order a Big Mac at a McDonalds and can't pay.
> Was at the ER once
The ER is different, they can't deny you treatment.
If you do not have insurance, do not have means of payment, yes they will not provide treatment. You cannot be denied in an emergency room, but you're not looking to get emergency room cancer treatment.
> The cancers and many other diseases have the best chances to be treated in the US.
If you can pay for treatment. That's why it's a false comparison.
> How is that better?
Do you want capitalism? Then the cost is that you have to pay to get the 90% chance. I'm highlighting, this is what you said you wanted, and you have it available to you.
I'd ALSO like to have 60% chance to people who can't pay the outrageous fees involved.
> EU is great at being mediocre.
No. Absolutely incorrect. EU is great at being mediocre, if you as an individual can't afford more.
You absolutely have the opportunity to achieve the highest peaks of the United States. You can BUY that 90%, if you can afford it.
So, EU has a mediocre low (taxpayer provided), and the highest peaks (if you can afford it.)
The US has the lowest valleys, and the highest peaks (if you can afford it.)
> Or do you think that everybody should have the same chances no matter what they do in their lives?
You're presenting the false alternative. If you can afford better treatment, you can buy better treatment.
> Put your foot where your mouth is!
I vote.
> They deny them entry? How does it look like "technically" ?
Roughly like what it looks like when you order a Big Mac at a McDonalds and can't pay.
> Was at the ER once
The ER is different, they can't deny you treatment.