Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If they misled the New York Times, then they've also misled the Wall Street Journal[1]:

> "Anthem’s Mr. Miller said the first sign of the attack came in the middle of last week, when a systems administrator noticed that a database query was being run using his identifier code although he hadn’t initiated it."

AnthemFacts was registered 54 days ago, which would be within the legal timeframe for disclosure that the Wall Street Journal notes in their article:

> "Federal law requires health-care companies to inform consumers and regulators when they suffer a data breach involving personally identifiable information, but they have as many as 60 days after the discovery of an attack to report it."

Lastly, some more "specifics" that NY Times didn't mention:

> "Investigators tracked the hacked data to an outside Web-storage service and were able to freeze it there, but it isn't yet clear if the hackers were able to earlier remove it to another location, Mr. Miller said. The Web storage service used by the hackers, which Mr. Miller declined to name, was one that is commonly used by U.S. companies, which may have made the initial data theft harder to detect."

[1] http://www.wsj.com/articles/health-insurer-anthem-hit-by-hac...



Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: