> This seems very unlikely. If they really just wanted to stop just AI tools
Same issue with Reddit, it's a false excuse for embarking on some other kind of cash-grab policy.
They claimed the almost-no-warning API changes were necessary to stop the "AI", except that all the big (and therefore significant) actors could have been stopped by a change to the terms of service or some modest rate-limits.
Same issue with Reddit, it's a false excuse for embarking on some other kind of cash-grab policy.
They claimed the almost-no-warning API changes were necessary to stop the "AI", except that all the big (and therefore significant) actors could have been stopped by a change to the terms of service or some modest rate-limits.