Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Due to some revenue sharing rules that just went into effect in Canada, designed to prevent news from being absorbed by Facebook and never leading to the ads being seen on the original website, FB is closing link. Sharing to cbc.ca. People can go there directly, but eventually safety information being everywhere is a good thing.


Perhaps it's only me, but Facebook is the last place I would think of to search information about wildfires.


Many people I know seem to basically rely on stuff they need to know showing up in their Facebook (or sometimes, even more bizarrely, Instagram) feed.


A lot of people spend time on Facebook. Therefore, it's a good way to push urgent information.

It's not where I would look for information. But that assumes I know I should be looking.


one doesn't search for it one stumbles onto it

and the only place to stumble onto information is where one spends the time - facebook, reddit, heck - even hackernews


A large chunk of old people in my life unfortunately still rely on FB for some news


The "revenue sharing rules" you speak of were a shakedown. Imagine if YC had to pay Tech Crunch for linking this post. They would shut down HN immediately. That's what they are requiring of FB.


Yeah except they aren't just providing a link, they are wrapping up the headline, a picture, and the first graph or two from the story onto timelines surrounded by their ads, which sends no revenue to the source. People don't click through. It just looks like "Facebook News". It's not that much different from a content farm.


> Yeah except they aren't just providing a link, they are wrapping up the headline, a picture, and the first graph or two from the story onto timelines surrounded by their ads, which sends no revenue to the source

Only to the extent allowed by news websites headers. Maybe this whole thing could have been solved by politicians understanding tech a little better?


> Maybe this whole thing could have been solved by politicians understanding tech a little better?

How often do we hear, on HN and elsewhere, people complain about laws they don't like wish politicians better understood what they are legislating? This implies the existence of a technological solution, set by technocrats who "understand" better. Whoever asks the question suggests politicians don't know better, offering that explanation without proof.

Also, for the Free Market enthusiasts out there, why hasn't the market solved this problem? What forces are preventing all parties from working out a technical and economic solution?


The market already sorted it out. Fat cat greedy news corps bought the politicians to circumvent the market.

This is like mandating car makers to pay whip makers.

> Also, for the Free Market enthusiasts out there, why hasn't the market solved this problem?

Why are assuming the market hasn't solved it? And that too without proof?

> Whoever asks the question suggests politicians don't know better, offering that explanation without proof.

It is easy. There is zero discussion of technology beyond sharing of links in the bill.


Or rather would shutdown linking to TechCrunch.


Imagine if HN just copied the first few paragraphs of the TechCrunch article and stole the pictures as well, completely cutting TechCrunch out of the loop.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: